Cantonal Bank of Basel (BKB)
Investment Fund (3a)
ISIN: CH1184401326

BKB Nachhaltig Aktien (CHF) V

Cantonal Bank of Basel (BKB)

Overall Rating

2.8/5

Total Costs

1.26%

Stocks

97%

Investment Strategy

Actively-managed fund

Currency

CHF

Investment Fund (3a)#76 / 82
View Top 10

Our Take on BKB Nachhaltig Aktien (CHF) V

Your Swiss Finance Companion
Adrien Missioux
Adrien Missioux

97% stocks, 1.26% TER, and only CHF 36 million. BKB's equity ESG fund is small, expensive, and mid-pack.

BKB Nachhaltig Aktien ranks #76 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It's the pure equity option in Basler Kantonalbank's sustainability range, with 97% in stocks. The three-year return of +26.53% sounds respectable until you compare it to cheaper equity funds that delivered 40-50% over the same period. No five-year track record is available yet.

Are the Fees Worth It?

The 1.26% TER makes this one of the most expensive equity 3a funds in Switzerland. On a 97% stock fund, you're paying active management fees for what could be replicated by a passive index at a fraction of the cost. VIAC's Global 100 charges 0.41% all-in and returned +45.26% over three years (estimated). BKB's fund returned +26.53%.

That's an 18-percentage-point gap over three years, partly explained by the TER difference and partly by active management decisions. On a CHF 50,000 portfolio, the 1.26% TER costs you CHF 630 per year. Over 25 years, that fee burden seriously undermines the whole point of choosing an aggressive equity allocation for growth.

What Actually Stands Out

Swing pricing protects existing investors from transaction costs, which is important in a small fund with more volatile flows. BKB's sustainability criteria are comprehensive, applying the same standards across their entire Nachhaltig range. The CHF-denominated focus provides some currency hedging versus purely global funds.

The cantonal bank backing from Basel-Stadt provides institutional security and a state guarantee. For investors who want pure equity exposure with a sustainability mandate through a traditional bank, BKB is one of the few options. The active management approach allows the team to tilt toward specific ESG themes.

What Most Reviews Miss

The CHF 36 million fund size is a genuine concern. Small funds have disproportionately high per-unit costs, less efficient trading, and higher closure or merger risk. For a retirement product you might hold for 20-30 years, trusting a CHF 36 million fund to survive and thrive is a meaningful act of faith.

Bank Cler's identical fund (Nachhaltig Aktien) is even smaller at CHF 14 million. Combined, the two sister funds hold just CHF 50 million. That's tiny for the equity fund category. The lack of five-year data means you're judging this fund on just three years, which is insufficient for a full market cycle assessment.

The Bottom Line

BKB Nachhaltig Aktien is the right product for a very specific investor: someone who banks with BKB, wants 97% equity exposure, insists on sustainability screening, and doesn't mind paying 1.26% for it. For everyone else, cheaper equity alternatives exist with better track records. Explore them in our guide to the best 3a investment funds in Switzerland.

Verdict: A niche ESG equity product that's too expensive and too small for most investors. The 1.26% TER erodes the growth advantage of high equity allocation.

Best For: BKB customers who specifically want a pure equity sustainability fund, investors who insist on ESG screening for their aggressive 3a allocation, those who value cantonal bank backing for a high-equity retirement fund
Consider Alternatives If: the CHF 36 million fund size is too small for your comfort level, you can access cheaper 95-100% equity funds through digital providers, you want a proven five-year track record before committing to a pure equity fund

Pros

  • Good 3-year performance (+26.5%)
  • No custody fee
  • Swing pricing protection

Cons

  • Higher total costs (1.26% p.a.)
  • Active management = higher fees
  • High stock allocation = more volatility
  • Limited track record (no 5-year data)
  • Smaller fund size

Product Details

At a Glance

  • 97% stocks allocation
  • TER: 1.26%
  • Swing pricing protection
  • Actively managed
  • No custody fee

Fund Details & Allocation

Asset Allocation

Stocks

97%

Bonds

0%

Other

2%

Investment Strategy

Actively-managed fund

Fund Size

CHF 36M

Depositary Bank

UBS Switzerland AG, Zürich

Swing Pricing

Yes

Fees & Costs

Synthetic TER

1.26%

Custody Fee

Free

Performance Over Time

Historical performance of this investment fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

1 Year

+2.5%

3 Years

+26.5%

Retirement Projection

Based on max. contribution of CHF 7'258/year, age 30 to 65 (35 years), starting from CHF 0.

Projected CapitalCHF 981'591
Total Contributions
CHF 254'030
Estimated Growth
+CHF 727'561
Net Return
6.9% p.a.
Gross: 8.2%
Fee Impact
-CHF 314'341
Total Fees: 1.26%
Contributions
With BKB Nachhaltig Aktien (CHF) V
Without fees
Simulate with our 3a CalculatorCustomize your age, contribution & risk profile for a detailed projection.

Compare to Similar Products

BKB Nachhaltig Aktien (CHF) V

BKB Nachhaltig Aktien (CHF) V

Cantonal Bank of Basel (BKB)

Apply Now
Migros Bank (CH) Fonds 0 V

Migros Bank (CH) Fonds 0 V

Migros Bank

Apply Now
Total Cost1.26%
Total Cost1.04%
5Y Performance-
5Y Performance-
Stocks97%
Stocks0%

Frequently Asked Questions

How does BKB Nachhaltig Aktien differ from Bank Cler's nearly identical product?
On the numbers, BKB Aktien (TER 1.26%, CHF 36.42M AUM) and Cler Aktien (TER 1.27%, CHF 13.89M AUM) are essentially the same Swisscanto-style mandate sold under two cantonal labels, both 97% equity with UBS Switzerland AG as custodian. The main difference is that BKB's fund is over 2.5x larger, which gives it modestly more operational stability.
Is 1.26% TER justified for a sustainable equity fund?
It is high, almost double the segment average of 0.68% and 3x the cheapest passive options. The active sustainability screening is what justifies the cost, but over 30 years of compounding the gap is severe. If pure equity exposure with light ESG is enough, low-cost passive options like frankly's Extreme range cost a fraction.
Does the +26.53% 3-year return justify the cost?
The +26.53% three-year return is in line with broad equity benchmarks for 2022-2025, but post-fee it lags the cheapest passive equity 3a funds by 2-3 percentage points. You're paying for active sustainability selection, not for outperformance versus the index.

How We Rated This Product

BKB Nachhaltig Aktien (CHF) V was evaluated as a product using our weighted scoring system.

Total Cost (TER + Fees) (30%)
Historical Performance (25%)
Fund Size & Stability (20%)
Asset Diversification (15%)
Swing Pricing & Protection (10%)

Ratings are updated monthly based on the latest available data. All products are evaluated using the same methodology.

Ready to Open?

Open the BKB Nachhaltig Aktien (CHF) V today and start enjoying its benefits.