Best Pillar 3a Investment Funds Switzerland of May 2026

Adrien MissiouxNadia Schmid
Reviewed by Nadia Schmid
Last updated on
Swiss Made

Compare the best pillar 3a investment funds in Switzerland for 2026. Find top-rated 3a funds with the lowest fees (TER), best performance track records, and transparent comparisons to maximize your retirement savings through smart investing.

Scroll horizontally to see more
ProductRating3Y Perf.Stock %Total CostsType
#1
VIAC Global 100 logo
VIAC Global 100
5.0/ 5
+42.7%
99%
0.41%
Fund (3a)
#2
frankly Extreme 95 Index logo
frankly Extreme 95 Index
4.9/ 5
+47.4%
95%
0.46%
Fund (3a)
#3
frankly Extreme 95 Responsible logo
frankly Extreme 95 Responsible
4.9/ 5
+44.3%
95%
0.45%
Fund (3a)
VIAC Global 80 logo
VIAC Global 80
4.9/ 5
+41.1%
80%
0.46%
Fund (3a)
Descartes Index 100 logo
Descartes Index 100
4.7/ 5
+36.2%
99%
0.64%
Fund (3a)
BLKB iQ Responsible Equity World ex Switzerland B logo
BLKB iQ Responsible Equity World ex Switzerland B
4.6/ 5
+54.2%
100%
0.46%
Fund (3a)
Descartes Index 80 logo
Descartes Index 80
4.6/ 5
+35.0%
80%
0.67%
Fund (3a)
frankly Strong 75 Index logo
frankly Strong 75 Index
4.7/ 5
+37.3%
75%
0.48%
Fund (3a)
frankly Strong 75 Responsible logo
frankly Strong 75 Responsible
4.7/ 5
+35.1%
75%
0.46%
Fund (3a)
VIAC Global 60 logo
VIAC Global 60
4.7/ 5
+32.0%
60%
0.44%
Fund (3a)

Personalized Match

Find Your Perfect Pillar 3a

Answer 5 questions. Get matched with the best Swiss Pillar 3a product for your profile.

Detailed Reviews: Top Investment Fund (3a) Products

In-depth analysis of the best investment fund (3a) in Switzerland. Explore fees, performance, pros, cons, and our expert take on each product.

Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
VIAC Global 100 logo

VIAC Global 100

Viac

Get Started
Rating
5.0/5
Stock %
99%
Total Costs
0.41%
3-Year Performance
+42.7%
Strategy & performance
99%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.41%

Strategy

Passive / Index

+8.2%

performance 1Y

+42.7%

performance 3Y

+51.5%

performance 5Y

Who it's for
Best For: long-term investors who want maximum equity exposure with minimal fees, tech-comfortable savers who prefer app-based portfolio management, anyone with 15+ years to retirement who can handle full market volatility
Consider Alternatives If: you're within 10 years of retirement and can't afford a major drawdown, you want a human advisor or physical branch for support, you prefer some bond allocation to smooth out the ride
Our Take

VIAC Global 100 ranks #1 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It's built for investors who want maximum equity exposure at rock-bottom cost. If you have 15+ years until retirement and can stomach market drops without losing sleep, this is the benchmark everyone else is measured against.

Pros
  • Low total costs (0.41% p.a.)
  • Strong 5-year performance (+51.5%)
  • No custody fee
Cons
  • High stock allocation = more volatility
  • No swing pricing protection
Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
frankly Extreme 95 Index logo

frankly Extreme 95 Index

frankly

Get Started
Rating
4.9/5
Stock %
95%
Total Costs
0.46%
3-Year Performance
+47.4%
Strategy & performance
95%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.46%

Strategy

Passive / Index

+9.7%

performance 1Y

+47.4%

performance 3Y

+52.8%

performance 5Y

Fund size

CHF 843M

Who it's for
Best For: performance-focused investors who want the highest-returning passive 3a fund, cost-conscious savers who prefer index tracking over active management, long-term investors comfortable with 95% equity exposure and no ESG filters
Consider Alternatives If: ESG and sustainability criteria matter to your investment decisions, you're within 5 years of retirement and can't handle sharp market drops, you prefer a lower stock allocation for reduced volatility
Our Take

Frankly Extreme 95 Index ranks #2 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It's frankly's pure performance play: 95% stocks, passive index tracking, no ESG filters, no active management decisions. With CHF 843 million in assets, it's also the largest fund in the frankly lineup. The numbers don't lie.

Pros
  • Low total costs (0.46% p.a.)
  • Strong 5-year performance (+52.8%)
  • No custody fee
  • Large fund size (stable)
Cons
  • High stock allocation = more volatility
  • No swing pricing protection
Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
frankly Extreme 95 Responsible logo

frankly Extreme 95 Responsible

frankly

Get Started
Rating
4.9/5
Stock %
95%
Total Costs
0.45%
3-Year Performance
+44.3%
Strategy & performance
95%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.45%

Strategy

Active

+7.7%

performance 1Y

+44.3%

performance 3Y

Fund size

CHF 447M

Who it's for
Best For: ESG-minded investors who want aggressive equity exposure without sacrificing returns, investors who value active sustainability screening over pure index tracking, frankly users looking for the responsible version of high-growth 3a investing
Consider Alternatives If: you prioritize raw returns over ESG criteria (the index version outperformed over 3 years), you want a long track record with 5+ years of performance data, you're uncomfortable with active management decisions on stock selection
Our Take

Frankly Extreme 95 Responsible ranks #3 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It's the top-ranked ESG fund in the country, combining sustainability screening with 95% equity exposure. If you want your retirement money aligned with environmental and social principles without sacrificing growth, this fund puts its money where its mouth is.

Pros
  • Low total costs (0.45% p.a.)
  • Good 3-year performance (+44.3%)
  • No custody fee
Cons
  • Active management = higher fees
  • High stock allocation = more volatility
Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
VIAC Global 80 logo

VIAC Global 80

Viac

Get Started
Rating
4.9/5
Stock %
80%
Total Costs
0.46%
3-Year Performance
+41.1%
Strategy & performance
80%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.46%

Strategy

Passive / Index

+9.0%

performance 1Y

+41.1%

performance 3Y

+49.0%

performance 5Y

Who it's for
Best For: investors with 10-20 years to retirement who want growth with a safety buffer, cost-conscious savers who prefer a balanced approach to aggressive equity-only funds, VIAC users who want automatic rebalancing between stocks and bonds
Consider Alternatives If: you want maximum returns and can handle 100% equity volatility, you're looking for a fund with CHF-hedged bonds, you need in-person support or prefer traditional banking
Our Take

VIAC Global 80 ranks #4 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. Think of it as VIAC Global 100's more sensible sibling. You still get strong equity growth, but the 20% bond allocation smooths out the bumps. For investors who want aggressive exposure without going all-in, this is the balanced aggression most people actually need.

Pros
  • Low total costs (0.46% p.a.)
  • Strong 5-year performance (+49.0%)
  • No custody fee
Cons
  • High stock allocation = more volatility
  • No swing pricing protection
Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
Descartes Index 100 logo

Descartes Index 100

Descartes

Get Started
Rating
4.7/5
Stock %
99%
Total Costs
0.64%
3-Year Performance
+36.2%
Strategy & performance
99%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.64%

Strategy

Passive / Index

+4.0%

performance 1Y

+36.2%

performance 3Y

+24.7%

performance 5Y

Who it's for
Best For: long-horizon investors who want index equity exposure with on-demand human advice, savers who prefer a personal securities account over a collective foundation, Swisscanto-friendly investors who like ESG-screened index funds as building blocks
Consider Alternatives If: you only care about absolute lowest fees and don't need an advisor (VIAC Global 100 is cheaper), you want a fund with a public ISIN and disclosed per-strategy AUM, you're within 10 years of retirement and need a meaningful bond cushion
Our Take

Descartes Index 100 ranks #5 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It's a passively-managed 99% equity strategy built on Swisscanto index funds and held in a personal securities account at Lienhardt & Partner Privatbank Zürich. Built for long-horizon investors who want index exposure plus optional human advice on demand.

Pros
  • Good 3-year performance (+36.2%)
  • No custody fee
Cons
  • High stock allocation = more volatility
  • No swing pricing protection
Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
BLKB iQ Responsible Equity World ex Switzerland B logo

BLKB iQ Responsible Equity World ex Switzerland B

Cantonal Bank of Basel-Landschaft (BLKB)

Get Started
Rating
4.6/5
Stock %
100%
Total Costs
0.46%
3-Year Performance
+54.2%
Strategy & performance
100%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.46%

Strategy

Passive / Index

+8.3%

performance 1Y

+54.2%

performance 3Y

+65.9%

performance 5Y

Fund size

CHF 254M

Who it's for
Best For: investors who want maximum global equity exposure without Swiss market overlap, ESG-conscious savers comfortable with cantonal bank 3a products, long-term investors who believe global markets will continue outperforming Switzerland
Consider Alternatives If: you want Swiss blue-chip exposure as part of your 3a portfolio, currency risk against the Swiss franc concerns you, you prefer the lowest-fee option and find 0.46% TER too high
Our Take

BLKB iQ Responsible Equity World ex Switzerland B ranks #6 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. This is a pure global equity play that deliberately excludes Swiss stocks. The result? Exposure to the world's biggest growth markets, and a five-year return that dwarfs nearly every competitor. But the 0.46% TER is notably higher than the digital-first providers.

Pros
  • Low total costs (0.46% p.a.)
  • Strong 5-year performance (+65.9%)
  • No custody fee
Cons
  • High stock allocation = more volatility
  • No swing pricing protection
Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
Descartes Index 80 logo

Descartes Index 80

Descartes

Get Started
Rating
4.6/5
Stock %
80%
Total Costs
0.67%
3-Year Performance
+35.0%
Strategy & performance
80%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.67%

Strategy

Passive / Index

+3.3%

performance 1Y

+35.0%

performance 3Y

+24.8%

performance 5Y

Who it's for
Best For: investors who want classic 80/20 index exposure with on-demand human advice, savers who prefer their own depot at a private bank over a collective foundation, ESG-curious investors who like Swisscanto Responsible index funds as the building blocks
Consider Alternatives If: you're fee-sensitive and won't use the advisor (pure-digital 80% strategies are 20-25 bps cheaper), you want a true bond sleeve rather than a money market sleeve in the defensive bucket, you need a fund with a public ISIN and disclosed AUM for due diligence
Our Take

Descartes Index 80 ranks #7 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It's a passive Swisscanto index strategy at 80% equity, 20% Swisscanto money market, held in a personal securities account at Lienhardt & Partner Privatbank Zürich. The classic aggressive-but-not-reckless allocation, with optional on-demand human advice.

Pros
  • Good 3-year performance (+35.0%)
  • No custody fee
Cons
  • High stock allocation = more volatility
  • No swing pricing protection
Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
frankly Strong 75 Index logo

frankly Strong 75 Index

frankly

Get Started
Rating
4.7/5
Stock %
75%
Total Costs
0.48%
3-Year Performance
+37.3%
Strategy & performance
75%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.48%

Strategy

Passive / Index

+8.2%

performance 1Y

+37.3%

performance 3Y

+41.5%

performance 5Y

Fund size

CHF 573M

Who it's for
Best For: investors who want balanced 75/25 exposure with pure index tracking, cost-conscious savers who prefer passive management over active stock-picking, anyone with 10-20 years to retirement looking for a set-it-and-forget-it 3a fund
Consider Alternatives If: sustainability and ESG screening are important to your investment values, you want higher bond allocation (20%+) for more stability, you're looking for maximum equity exposure above 90%
Our Take

Frankly Strong 75 Index ranks #8 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It's the passive counterpart to the Strong 75 Responsible, and the numbers make a clear case: +37.29% over three years versus +35.09% for the active ESG version. With CHF 573 million in assets, it's one of the most trusted balanced 3a funds in the country.

Pros
  • Low total costs (0.48% p.a.)
  • Strong 5-year performance (+41.5%)
  • No custody fee
  • Large fund size (stable)
Cons
  • No swing pricing protection
Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
frankly Strong 75 Responsible logo

frankly Strong 75 Responsible

frankly

Get Started
Rating
4.7/5
Stock %
75%
Total Costs
0.46%
3-Year Performance
+35.1%
Strategy & performance
75%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.46%

Strategy

Active

+5.8%

performance 1Y

+35.1%

performance 3Y

+42.9%

performance 5Y

Fund size

CHF 497M

Who it's for
Best For: ESG-conscious investors who want balanced growth with bond-cushioned downside protection, investors with 10-15 years to retirement seeking a moderate-growth strategy, anyone who values sustainability screening but doesn't want to go all-in on equities
Consider Alternatives If: you prioritize raw performance over ESG criteria (the index version outperforms), you want 90%+ equity exposure for maximum long-term growth, you're comfortable with a savings account and don't want market risk
Our Take

Frankly Strong 75 Responsible ranks #9 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It hits the middle ground between growth and caution: enough equity for meaningful returns, enough bonds to soften downturns, and active ESG management to align with your values. With CHF 497 million in assets, plenty of Swiss investors agree this balance works.

Pros
  • Low total costs (0.46% p.a.)
  • Strong 5-year performance (+42.9%)
  • No custody fee
Cons
  • Active management = higher fees
Good for: Investment Fund (3a)
VIAC Global 60 logo

VIAC Global 60

Viac

Get Started
Rating
4.7/5
Stock %
60%
Total Costs
0.44%
3-Year Performance
+32.0%
Strategy & performance
60%

allocated to stocks

Total cost

0.44%

Strategy

Passive / Index

+7.4%

performance 1Y

+32.0%

performance 3Y

+38.2%

performance 5Y

Who it's for
Best For: moderate-risk investors who want the cheapest balanced 3a fund available, savers with 10-15 years to retirement who want growth with meaningful downside protection, fee-sensitive investors who understand the long-term impact of cost differences
Consider Alternatives If: you want more than 60% equity exposure for higher long-term returns, you prefer in-person advisory support during market volatility, you want ESG-screened investments for sustainability alignment
Our Take

VIAC Global 60 ranks #10 among 82 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It's the most affordable way to get a 60/40 stock-bond split in your 3a. For investors who want meaningful growth without the stomach-churning drops of high-equity funds, VIAC's lowest-cost balanced option delivers where it counts: your wallet.

Pros
  • Low total costs (0.44% p.a.)
  • Strong 5-year performance (+38.2%)
  • No custody fee
Cons
  • No swing pricing protection
Adrien MissiouxNadia Schmid
Reviewed byNadia Schmid
Last updated on

Finding the best pillar 3a investment funds in Switzerland

Pillar 3a investment funds beat savings accounts long-term by throwing your money into stocks, bonds, and other assets. Got 10+ years until retirement? The math is pretty clear: funds are the smart move.

Here's what's not obvious: picking the right fund versus the wrong one costs you about CHF 80,000 over 30 years on typical contributions. A fund charging 1.2% versus one at 0.39%? That difference doesn't just hurt a little. It compounds against you every single year for decades. That's your retirement money, not returns you failed to earn.

Q1 2026 update: Volatility hit but the leaderboard didn't move. Finpension Global 100 closed Q1 at -1.79% YTD (per its 31 March 2026 factsheet) and VIAC Global 100 sits at +0.4% YTD, yet both still rank ahead of higher-fee bank funds because +12.85% in 2025 (Finpension Global 100) plus a low TER beats a smaller drawdown at 1.2% all-in cost over any 10-year window.

How 3a investment funds actually work

3a investment funds pool your money with other investors to buy diversified portfolios of stocks, bonds, and other stuff. You buy shares in the fund, which owns the actual investments.

The basics:

  • Diversification: Your money spreads across hundreds or thousands of securities
  • Professional management: Managers or algorithms handle the buying and selling
  • Daily pricing: Fund shares get valued every trading day
  • Automatic reinvestment: Dividends and interest go back into the fund
  • Tax efficiency: No capital gains taxes on trades inside the 3a wrapper (nice)

The Swiss Federal Social Insurance Office regulates 3a products, making sure funds meet diversification and risk requirements.

Active vs passive: the one thing that really matters

This choice affects your costs and returns more than almost anything else.

Passive Index Funds

Track market indices automatically. Cheaper (0.39-0.55% TER), predictable, backed by decades of research. 80-90% of active funds underperform passive after fees.

Active Funds

Managers try to beat the market. More expensive (0.80-1.50% TER), might outperform but usually don't. Nearly impossible to pick winners in advance.

Passive index funds

Passive funds track market indices (like MSCI World or SPI) without trying to beat them. They just buy and hold what's in the index.

Why passive wins:

  • Cheaper (usually 0.39% to 0.55% TER)
  • Predictable performance versus the benchmark
  • No manager screwing up with bad calls
  • Transparent strategy
  • Backed by decades of research showing it works

Active funds

Active funds pay managers to try beating the market through stock picking and timing.

The reality:

  • More expensive (0.80% to 1.50% TER)
  • Might beat the market, might not
  • Manager skill (or luck) determines outcomes
  • Less predictable

Here's what the data actually shows: Over 10-15 years, 80-90% of active funds underperform their benchmarks after fees. The few that do outperform? Nearly impossible to spot in advance. This is why I (and most evidence-based investors) stick with passive index funds for retirement money.

Why TER (fees) will make or break you

TER is your annual cost for owning a fund. It's a percentage that includes management fees, custody, admin stuff, trading costs. Everything.

What you'll see in 2026:

  • Low-cost digital providers: 0.39% to 0.49% (Finpension, VIAC)
  • Mid-range: 0.50% to 0.75% (frankly, some banks)
  • Traditional banks/insurers: 0.80% to 1.50%
The damage over time
  • CHF 7,056 yearly contributions for 30 years at 5% average returns:
  • At 0.39% TER: You end up with about CHF 470,000
  • At 1.20% TER: You end up with about CHF 390,000
  • Difference: CHF 80,000 gone to fees

This isn't theoretical. These are real costs of picking expensive funds. Every 0.1% in fees works against you compounding every year for decades.

Picking your stock allocation (and why it matters)

Funds offer different equity levels from 0% to 99% stocks. More stocks = more bounce, but better long-term returns.

Conservative

0-35% stocks. For 5-10 years from retirement. Capital preservation over growth. Expect 2-4% yearly.

Balanced

35-65% stocks. Middle ground for moderate exposure. Popular with unsure investors. Expect 4-5% yearly.

Growth

65-85% stocks. Higher growth for 15+ year horizons. Can stomach volatility. Expect 5-7% yearly.

Maximum Equity

85-99% stocks. Highest returns for 25+ years out. Crashes hard short-term but wins long-term. Expect 6-8% yearly.

What I do: With 20+ years until retirement, I'm all-in on maximum equity funds. Short-term drops don't matter when I can't touch the money for decades anyway. The math clearly favors accepting volatility for higher returns.

What else actually matters when comparing funds

Performance history

Past performance doesn't guarantee future returns, but 3-5 years of data shows if a fund does what it claims.

What to check:

  • How it compares to benchmark indices
  • Net returns after fees (the only number that counts)
  • Consistency across different markets
  • For passive funds: tracking error (how well it follows the index)

Don't get excited about one good year. Look for consistency. Passive funds should match their benchmarks. Active funds better have a good explanation for any outperformance.

Features and flexibility

Beyond costs and returns:

  • Equity options: Can you go 99% stocks or stuck at 80%?
  • ESG/sustainable options: If that matters to you
  • Currency hedging: Some hedge foreign exposure (adds cost, questionable benefit)
  • Rebalancing: Automatic or manual
  • Digital experience: How good is the app?
  • Multiple accounts: Can you open several? (Important for tax-smart withdrawals)

Provider stability

You're trusting these people for decades:

  • Financial backing
  • How long they've run 3a products
  • FINMA oversight and compliance
  • Assets under management
  • Service quality

Newer digital providers (Finpension, VIAC) have shorter track records but solid backing and regulation. Traditional banks have longer histories but charge way more.

Investment funds vs savings accounts: which one?

For long-term money, the math is clear. Emotionally? Some people struggle with it.

Go with investment funds if:

  • You have 10+ years until retirement
  • You get that short-term losses are normal and temporary
  • You want maximum growth potential
  • You won't obsessively check your balance during crashes

Stick with savings if:

  • You're 5-10 years from retirement
  • Market drops genuinely stress you out
  • You might panic-sell during downturns (this destroys returns)

Check our 3a savings account comparison for the conservative route. Tons of people split between both.

The mistakes everyone makes with 3a funds

Just using your bank's fund

Traditional banks charge 2-3x what digital providers do for basically the same passive index exposure. Your "convenience" is costing you CHF 50,000+ over your lifetime. Opening a low-cost account takes 15 minutes.

Low equity when you're young

A 25-year-old picking "balanced" 50% stocks instead of 99% is sacrificing massive returns. With 35+ years until retirement, short-term volatility is totally irrelevant. High equity is mathematically optimal for long horizons.

Trying to time the market

Waiting for "better entry points" or selling during crashes planning to buy back lower? Almost never works. Time in the market beats timing the market. Contribute consistently no matter what's happening.

Chasing past performance, ignoring fees

A fund that returned 12% last year at 1.2% TER isn't better than one returning 11% at 0.4%. Past performance rarely repeats, but fees are forever. Focus on what you control: costs.

Not opening multiple accounts

Switzerland taxes 3a withdrawals separately but progressively. Multiple smaller accounts over several years = lower taxes per withdrawal. Open 3-5 accounts during your career, withdraw one yearly at retirement.

How much stock exposure for your age?

These are starting points, not rules. Your risk tolerance, other assets, and situation matter. Someone with a stable government job and paid-off house can handle more risk than someone self-employed with variable income.

Most low-cost providers let you adjust equity over time as you near retirement. Start aggressive, dial it down gradually.

Why global diversification matters

Good 3a funds invest globally, not just Swiss stocks. Switzerland is under 3% of global market cap. Concentrating here means missing most of the world's growth.

Typical allocation in diversified equity funds:

  • 50-60% developed markets (US, Europe, Japan)
  • 5-15% emerging markets
  • 10-20% Switzerland (slight home bias)
  • Rest in smaller markets

Currency exposure to USD and EUR comes naturally with global diversification. Some providers offer hedged versions, but hedging costs money and hurts long-term returns. Over decades, currency swings average out anyway.

What I actually do with my own 3a

After analyzing dozens of options and running my own 3a for years, here's my actual setup:

  1. Maximum equity (99% stocks) because I've got 20+ years
  2. Lowest-cost passive funds with TER under 0.45%
  3. Global diversification with minimal Swiss home bias
  4. Multiple accounts (three now, planning for five by retirement)
  5. Automatic monthly contributions set up right after opening
  6. Never checking balances during crashes

This isn't exciting. No clever strategy or special insight. Just well-established principles: minimize costs, maximize time in market, diversify globally, avoid emotional decisions.

Adrien Missioux
Adrien MissiouxFounder, GetRates

The Federal Tax Administration has detailed guidance on 3a taxation that shaped my withdrawal planning.

How we compare these funds

We focus on what impacts your long-term returns:

Cost analysis

We calculate total costs: TER, account fees, hidden charges. All-in costs show true expense differences.

Performance tracking

We track net returns after fees versus benchmarks. Both absolute and risk-adjusted performance across market cycles.

Strategy review

Investment philosophy, index selection for passive funds, consistency of approach.

Provider evaluation

Financial stability, regulatory compliance, digital experience, customer service.

For all your 3a options, see our complete pillar 3a comparison.

Questions everyone asks

What's the best pillar 3a investment fund in Switzerland?

The best fund combines low fees (under 0.45% TER), high equity for long-term folks, global diversification, and a solid provider. Finpension and VIAC lead for their combo of low costs and quality passive strategies. Compare current offerings in the table above.

What do 3a investment funds typically cost?

Fees range from 0.39% to 1.50% TER yearly. Low-cost digital providers charge 0.39-0.49%. Traditional banks hit you for 0.80-1.50%. Over 30 years, that spread can exceed CHF 80,000 on standard contributions.

Active or passive funds?

Passive index funds for retirement. Research consistently shows 80-90% of active funds underperform benchmarks after fees over 10-15 years. Passive = lower costs, predictable results, better long-term performance for most people.

What stock allocation should I pick?

Base it on years until retirement. 20+ years? Consider 85-99% stocks. 10-20 years? 60-85% makes sense. Under 10 years? Think about 40-60% or partially switching to savings. More stocks = more bounce, but better expected long-term gains.

Can I switch between funds?

Yes, most providers let you switch funds without fees or taxes. You can adjust equity as you age or if your risk tolerance changes. Switching providers means transferring your account (2-4 weeks, should be free).

How do funds compare to savings accounts?

Investment funds historically return 4-7% yearly long-term versus 0.5-1.5% for savings. Over 30 years, that compounds to hundreds of thousands of francs difference. But funds carry short-term volatility that savings don't. Funds for long horizons, savings for shorter periods or low risk tolerance.

What's TER and why should I care?

TER (Total Expense Ratio) is your annual cost as a percentage. Includes all management, custody, admin fees. It matters because it compounds against you every year. A 0.8% TER difference over 30 years? CHF 50,000+ gone.

Can I have multiple investment fund accounts?

Yes, multiple accounts are smart for tax optimization. Withdrawing from separate smaller accounts over multiple years keeps each in a lower tax bracket. Most people want 3-5 accounts by retirement.

Fund Performance Compared

Track records of all major 3a investment funds with after-fee returns vs benchmarks. Performance data.

Fund Fees & TER

Total Expense Ratios compared: understand exactly what each provider charges. Fee comparison.

Investment Strategy Guide

How to choose the right equity allocation and fund mix for your timeline. Strategy guide.

Passive vs. Active Funds

Index funds vs actively managed: which approach wins for 3a investing? The comparison.

Sustainable 3a Funds

ESG and sustainable investing options within pillar 3a. Sustainable funds.

Getting Started with 3a Funds

New to 3a investing? Step-by-step guide to opening your first fund account. Beginner's guide.

Savings vs. Investing

Not sure if savings or funds are right for you? We break down the decision. Decision guide.

Best 3a Products Overall

Complete comparison of all pillar 3a providers. Full ranking.

All 3a Fees Compared

Beyond fund TER: account fees, transfer costs, and hidden charges. Full fee guide.

About the author

Adrien Missioux

Adrien Missioux

Founder & Lead Author

Entrepreneur who bootstrapped a SaaS to multi-million revenue. Building GetRates.ch to bring transparency to Swiss finance.

About the reviewer

Nadia Schmid

Nadia Schmid

Financial Analyst & Reviewer

Financial analyst with expertise in Swiss banking products. Reviews GetRates.ch content for accuracy and completeness to ensure readers receive trustworthy information.

Last updated on