frankly Strong 75 Responsible

75% stocks with a 20% bond cushion and full ESG screening. The balanced choice.

Overall Rating
4.8/5
Ranked #13 of 122View Top 10
  • Investment Fund (3a)
  • ISIN CH0497631454
Adrien Missioux
Written by Adrien Missioux
Last updated on Swiss Made
frankly
Total Costs
0.46%
Stocks
75%
Performance · 5 Years
+32.6%
Investment Strategy
Actively-managed fund
Best For:
ESG-conscious investors who want balanced growth with bond-cushioned downside protection, investors with 10-15 years to retirement seeking a moderate-growth strategy, anyone who values sustainability screening but doesn't want to go all-in on equities
Consider Alternatives If:
you prioritize raw performance over ESG criteria (the index version has outperformed over one and three years), you want 90%+ equity exposure for maximum long-term growth, you're comfortable with a savings account and don't want market risk
On This Page

Our Take on frankly Strong 75 Responsible

Frankly Strong 75 Responsible ranks #13 among 122 3a investment funds in Switzerland. It hits the middle ground between growth and caution: enough equity for meaningful returns, enough bonds to soften downturns, and active ESG management to align with your values. With CHF 497 million in assets, plenty of Swiss investors agree this balance works.

Are the Fees Competitive?

You pay 0.46% total (0.02% synthetic TER plus 0.44% flat fee). For an actively managed ESG fund with a 75/20 stock-bond split, that's excellent. Most comparable funds from traditional banks charge 0.90-1.30%. Over 25 years of max contributions, the fee difference alone could mean CHF 15'000-20'000 more at retirement.

The three-year return of +39.69% and five-year return of +32.58% are solid for a balanced fund. You're not chasing the highest returns, but you're not leaving money on the table either.

What Actually Stands Out

The swing pricing mechanism protects you when large investors move money in or out. Without it, their transaction costs get shared across all holders. With it, the moving party bears their own costs. During volatile periods, this can save existing investors 0.1-0.3% annually.

The ESG screening by Swisscanto applies both exclusion criteria (no controversial weapons, no thermal coal) and positive selection (companies with strong sustainability ratings). It's not just a marketing label. The 20% bond allocation also includes sustainability-screened fixed income.

What Most Reviews Miss

The index version (frankly Strong 75 Index) returned +43.15% over three years compared to this fund's +39.69%. That's a roughly 3.5-percentage-point gap favoring passive. Active ESG management sounds appealing, but it has trailed the simpler index approach over one and three years in frankly's own product lineup, even if it edges ahead over five.

Also, "75% stocks" doesn't tell the whole story. The remaining 20% bonds and 5% other assets introduce their own risks, including interest rate sensitivity. When rates rose sharply in 2022, both the equity and bond portions of balanced funds dropped simultaneously. Diversification didn't fully protect investors.

The Bottom Line

A strong choice for investors who want growth, ESG alignment, and some downside protection in one package. The fees are fair, the fund size is reassuring, and the track record is solid. Use our Pillar 3a calculator to see how this allocation projects over your specific timeline.

Verdict: Ideal for ESG-conscious investors with 10-15 years to retirement who want balanced growth without extreme volatility.

Pros
  • Low total costs (0.46% p.a.)
  • Strong 5-year performance (+32.6%)
  • No custody fee
  • Swing pricing protection
Cons
  • Active management = higher fees

Product Details

  • 75% stocks allocation
  • TER: 0.02%
  • Swing pricing protection
  • Actively managed
  • No custody fee

Fund Details

Investment Strategy
Actively-managed fund
Fund Size
CHF 497M
Depositary Bank
Zürcher Kantonalbank (ZKB)
Swing Pricing
Yes

Fees & Costs

Synthetic TER
0.02%
Flat Fee
0.44%
Custody Fee
Free

Asset Allocation

How this fund splits your 3a money across asset classes, as published by the provider.

Stocks 77.3%Bonds 14.4%Real Estate 5.7%Money Market 2.5%
77.3%Stocks
  • StocksSwitzerland 19.4% · Abroad 57.9%77.3%
    • Foreign EquitiesWorld ex Switzerland57.9%
    • Swiss EquitiesSwitzerland19.4%
  • BondsSwitzerland 2.8% · Abroad 11.6%14.4%
    • Bonds Foreign CurrencyGlobal11.6%
    • Bonds CHFSwitzerland2.8%
  • Real EstateSwitzerland5.7%
    • Real Estate SwitzerlandSwitzerland5.7%
  • Money Market2.5%
    • Money Market2.5%

Detailed breakdown as published by the provider, as of September 30, 2026.Source

Performance Over Time

Historical performance of this investment fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

1 Year
+14.2%
3 Years
+39.7%
5 Years
+32.6%

Retirement Projection

Based on max. contribution of CHF 7'258/year, age 30 to 65 (35 years), starting from CHF 0.

Projected CapitalCHF 703'979
Total Contributions
CHF 254'030
Estimated Growth
+CHF 449'949
Net Return
5.3% p.a.
Gross: 5.8%
Fee Impact
-CHF 71'581
Total Fees: 0.46%
Contributions
With frankly Strong 75 Responsible
Without fees
Simulate with our 3a CalculatorCustomize your age, contribution & risk profile for a detailed projection.

Compare to Similar Products

frankly Strong 75 Responsible

frankly Strong 75 Responsible

frankly

Visit provider
Descartes Index 80

Descartes Index 80

Descartes

View offer
Total Cost0.46%
Total Cost0.65%
5Y Performance+32.6%
5Y Performance+33.8%
Stocks75%
Stocks80%
Not sure? Compare with alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Responsible outperform Index over 5 years?

Yes, slightly. The Responsible version posted +32.58% versus +30.84% for the Index sibling over five years. Past performance is not a forward indicator, but with the same 0.44% flat fee, the active ESG variant didn't cost performance in this period.

Why is the synthetic TER only 0.02% on an actively-managed fund?

It's actively managed at the strategy level, but holdings include passive index components that pull the synthetic TER down to 0.02%. Combined with the 0.44% flat platform fee, all-in ongoing cost is about 0.46%, which is competitive with pure passive products.

How does the 1-year performance gap of +14.19% vs Index +14.70% read?

Over the most recent year, the Index variant of Strong 75 returned +14.70% versus +14.19% here. ESG screens can lead the active variant to underweight certain sectors that rallied. Performance gaps in single years are normal; the five-year reading remains slightly favourable for Responsible.

How We Rated This Product

frankly Strong 75 Responsible was evaluated as a product using our weighted scoring system.

  • Total Cost (TER + Fees) (30%)
  • Historical Performance (25%)
  • Fund Size & Stability (20%)
  • Asset Diversification (15%)
  • Swing Pricing & Protection (10%)

Ratings are updated monthly based on the latest available data. All products are evaluated using the same methodology.

Information may have changed since our last review. Please verify all details directly with the provider before making any decisions.

frankly Strong 75 Responsible

4.8/5

Visit provider